Mockingjay (The Hunger Games, Book 3) [Hardcover]

Monday, March 19, 2012

Mockingjay (The Hunger Games, Book 3) [Hardcover]

Product Details

Reading level: Ages 13 and up
Hardcover: 400 pages
Publisher: Scholastic Press; 1st edition (August 24, 2010)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0439023513
ISBN-13: 978-0439023511
Product Dimensions: 8.3 x 5.8 x 1.3 inches
Shipping Weight: 1.4 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)

By : Suzanne Collins
List Price : ~~$17.99~~
Price : $9.80
You Save : $8.19 (46%)

Customer Reviews

This was a brilliant conclusion to the trilogy. I can only compare it to "Ender's Game" - and that is extremely high praise, indeed.
When I first closed the book last night, I felt shattered, empty, and drained.
And that was the point, I think. I'm glad I waited to review the book because I'm not sure what my review would have been.
For the first two books, I think most of us readers have all been laboring under the assumption that Katniss Everdeen would eventually choose one of the two terrific men in her life: Gale, her childhood companion or Peeta, the one who accompanied her to the Hunger Games twice. She'd pick one of them and live happily ever after with him, surrounded by friends and family. Somehow, along the way, Katniss would get rid of the awful President Snow and stop the evil Hunger Games. How one teenage girl would do all that, we weren't too sure, but we all had faith and hope that she would.
"Mockingjay" relentlessly strips aside those feelings of faith and hope - much as District 13 must have done to Katniss. Katniss realizes that she is just as much a pawn for District 13 as she ever was for the Colony and that evil can exist in places outside of the Colony.
And that's when the reader realizes that this will be a very different journey. And that maybe the first two books were a setup for a very different ride. That, at its heart, this wasn't a story about Katniss making her romantic decisions set against a backdrop of war.
This is a story of war. And what it means to be a volunteer and yet still be a pawn. We have an entirely volunteer military now that is spread entirely too thin for the tasks we ask of it. The burden we place upon it is great. And at the end of the day, when the personal war is over for each of them, each is left alone to pick up the pieces as best he/she can.
For some, like Peeta, it means hanging onto the back of a chair until the voices in his head stop and he's safe to be around again. Each copes in the best way he can. We ask - no, demand - incredible things of our men and women in arms, and then relegate them to the sidelines afterwards because we don't want to be reminded of the things they did in battle. What do you do with people who are trained to kill when they come back home? And what if there's no real home to come back to - if, heaven forbid, the war is fought in your own home? We need our soldiers when we need them, but they make us uncomfortable when the fighting stops.
All of that is bigger than a love story - than Peeta or Gale. And yet, Katniss' war does come to an end. And she does have to pick up the pieces of her life and figure out where to go at the end. So she does make a choice. But compared to the tragedy of everything that comes before it, it doesn't seem "enough". And I think that's the point. That once you've been to hell and lost so much, your life will never be the same. Katniss will never be the same. For a large part of this book, we see Katniss acting in a way that we can only see as being combat-stress or PTSD-related - running and hiding in closets. This isn't our Katniss, this isn't our warrior girl.
But this is what makes it so much more realistic, I think. Some may see this as a failing in plot - that Katniss is suddenly acting out of character. But as someone who has been around very strong soldiers returning home from deployments, this story, more than the other two, made Katniss come alive for me in a much more believable way.
I realize many out there will hate the epilogue and find it trite. At first, I did too. But in retrospect, it really was perfect. Katniss gave her life already - back when she volunteered for Prim in "The Hunger Games". It's just that she actually physically kept living.
The HBO miniseries, "Band of Brothers", has a quote that sums this up perfectly. When Captain Spiers says, "The only hope you have is to accept the fact that you're already dead. The sooner you accept that, the sooner you'll be able to function as a soldier is supposed to function: without mercy, without compassion, without remorse. All war depends upon it."
But how do you go from that, to living again in society? You really don't. So I'm not sure Katniss ever really did - live again. She just ... kept going. And there's not really much to celebrate in that. Seeing someone keep going, despite being asked - no, demanded - to do unconscionably horrifying things, and then being relegated to the fringes of society, and then to keep going - to pick up the pieces and keep on going, there is something fine and admirable and infinitely sad and pure and noble about that. But the fact is, it should never happen in the first place.
And that was the point, I think.

I found the entire story to be very sloppily written.
In some ways, yes, I agree that this story is a war-story, and some of the scenes were rather poignant and helped invoked the theme that yes, war really really sucks. There's no doubt about it.
However, I don't think this was great literature. Actually, comparing it to Twilight, with such scenes as the "let's talk about who the girl is going to pick while she's asleep" and the fact that whenever a major event occurs Katniss is conveniently in the hospital or unconscious and needs to be told about it later (whatever happened to show, not tell, Collins?), is not that far of a stretch. The characters that we fell in love with throughout the series, the reason the Hunger Games was wildly popular in the first place, were mysteriously missing the entire last book. Katniss was hollow and dead, Peeta was absent and even absent when he was there, Gale STILL had no personality, and Haymitch lost his sarcasm and spunk. I'm serious about Gale: whenever he talked or ranted about the Capital, it was like Katniss pulled a switch, refusing to let the reader understand this character at all. And Haymitch, while in the first books he seemed to have his hand in all the cookie jars, in the last book he was strangely uninvolved in the entire scheme to take over the Capital. All of them were "there" by name, but not by personality. What was the point of having them there if none of us could recognize them? Why not just write an entirely new book with new character names to apply to these misfits? It didn't fit at all. And, yes, there is nothing wrong with having characters who are affected by the horrors of war. I was actually impressed at the beginning by how Collins developed that sense of hopelessness. However, these were no longer the characters we fell in love with, nor did they share the relationship dynamics of the first two books.
The pacing was also off completely. There was no real build-up, nothing was accomplished, and it just sort of sputtered off into nothingness at the end. I understand that this is supposedly "realistic", but at the same time it was just too dull and it dragged. Collins is a great action writer, there was no reason it should have had been that way. There are plenty of books that show the destitution and hopelessness of war without dragging, so you can't tell me that there are no other ways to present this other than what Collins gave us. Prim and Finnick died without a moment's thought or a chance to grieve, and we know this is not how Collins usually writes it, just based on how she presents Rue's death in the first book. And then to lead us on, for pages and pages filled with character deaths and confusing horrors (I can't be the only one who failed to understand the setup of the Capitals and the bizarre pods) only for Katniss to just pass out again with nothing accomplished. It was like, thanks Collins, for a completely pointless drag of action for no reason whatsoever. At least the first two books you gave us had action scenes that actually meant something to the overall plot structure.
So, just overall, it was rather sloppy. Poorly paced, poorly written, characters forgotten or abandoned, and nothing we loved about the first two books even encompassed within the third book at all.